data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2eaa7/2eaa7f37012a825f39c70f402ab47a5d7d6987d8" alt="Use transmit 5 after trial reddit"
I recommend MIT books Building Successful Online Communities. Truly: there is no such thing as apolitical technology. Just because everyone is treated equally doesn’t mean that the end result isn’t biased. There’s equality of opportunity and equality of outcome.
#Use transmit 5 after trial reddit mod#
>It's not so much that there is no possible way that any ramification of this case could ever put a user or a mod of a site like reddit in any jeopardy in any conceivable scenario.It's more like, sites like Reddit have a lot to lose if their algorithmic recommendations should become legally analogous to editorial decisions. That's a less flattering PR angle than playing up the possibility that reddit users or mods could get in legal trouble.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12d2f/12d2f42b695099b6ec31825b4b21ad0149529b5f" alt="use transmit 5 after trial reddit use transmit 5 after trial reddit"
It's really important for reddit's bottom line to have broad latitude to gamify user engagement by showing more of what will keep people on reddit longer and more-frequently. >The algorithms that keep people clicking/viewing/refreshing the site are critical to the business interests of sites like Reddit and Youtube. But we as users don't really need to worry too much about every conceivable edge-case legal theory, because a site like reddit would presumably be incentivized to remove or disable any tools that could create such a liability, to protect Reddit's own self-interest. voting/reporting), there are sort of fringe or edge-case scenarios where the lines could potential blur between algorithmic policies and user/moderator actions. >Because those tools are sometimes set up by moderators and influenced by user actions (e.g. The bigger and more realistic threat to a site like reddit is the possibility that actions taken by tools like automoderators, slur filters, or recommendation algorithms (e.g., sorting by "hot") might become legally analogous to editorial decisions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5c8d/c5c8de6f58669484fd9b22e975ad844d65ea42dc" alt="use transmit 5 after trial reddit use transmit 5 after trial reddit"
>The issue has been muddied by sites like reddit who have been keen to play up outlandish possibilities of individual users or volunteer moderators becoming liable, which has never been a likely outcome of this case. There were some interesting observations on r/law, particularly this one.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2eaa7/2eaa7f37012a825f39c70f402ab47a5d7d6987d8" alt="Use transmit 5 after trial reddit"